|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Welcome to the Twenty Zeros first decade defining and celebrating the 21st century and post third millennium on planet Earth. Your Help Is Appreciated And Important. A "Million Independents March On Washington" is forming now. 1,000,000 petitioned signatures are sought and your kind contribution any is appreciated. There is "much incongruous legislation" in our land risen out of the "civil rights travesty" of a 2 in 1 party system clearly with firm control in America. You should contact the leadership N O W at CUIP "The Committee For A Unified Independent Party" ready and able to put an independent in the White House soon. Please don't concern yourself with who or what (candidacy) party forges "for now but know right now" and join us now today. My work at the "United Debates Of America is to concern candidates and leaders to considerations of other than "Republican or Democratic" platformed parties while not with objection to these political forces. Dial for updates on "The March" to 1-800-555-8355 and when at "catagories enter" or just speak keyword "announcements" followed by the key number 1010994#.  Hear Tibet Day EDITORIAL STATEMENT FROM UNITED STATES PUBLISHER My planning document is preparred for help to organizers in a multiparty system presently a working campaign in the United States that are moving towards multinational economies for everyones use in sharing and shaping their own word documents "proposed as legislation" on same topics declaring "public rights and freedoms." It is not inconsistant with the global problem of conspiracy and terrorism. It is my concern in and for this word proposal to see a "central document" emerge as by co-initiators of the "campaign reform" movement, for an Equal Campaign Rights Amendment and with some consideration of the highlights of this page and highlights of the independent movement. WE MUST Nominate "Four In Four" Goal is "Four Parties (With Leadership) In 2004 Presidential And V. P. Elections."Shoot for 4 parties with presidential candidacies and achieve 3 (anyway) contenders in a popular state-for-state vote outcome, with the otherwise "not to date yet", third party now or then achieving a second or first result outcome, through a continued using of the "Electoral College Base" which is based on prior popular state vote tallies. The Twenty-First Star Is The Star Located "As Our 4th Star In The 4th Row" Of Our US Flag. This Post and the "Twenty Zeros" Records will be updated regularly and posted here for your viewing pleasure. Please note that (when & if) 3 contending candicacies rise before the electoral count, there would require "only but" 181 electoral votes "to clinch" and when with 4 contenders splitting up electoral votes "136 would win." Frushour Twenty Zeros Report Vo. 12.10.2000 Title: "Why Pay Homage To A Two Party System"?Proposed Law for Senate Commissioner(s) to oblige public Candidates of strong party contention to recommend in their each Address to viewers/voters as a first campaign order & party agenda, "the new E.C.R.A. (Equal Campaign Reform Act/Amendment) as retroactive, in escalation of their platform to favorable public conditions with News Media, which their purposed platform for and with President and Vice-President election overtones as their sought for political outcome(s) of and by a "4-year by 4-year" campaign as their personal career choosing and presented us by "public announcement." As a rider and/or further legislation to the "law and major enactment of ECRA" now initiated by C.R.A.C. Campaign Reform Action Coalition, "Any & All Media Reporting in the U.S. with exclusions to World Wide Web secured participants with media and/or "further on with any legal provision of content," should as must record logisticlly to the Commission "equal acurate minutes" of each Candidates news coverage or be in violation and subject to judicial investigation in accordance with federal or state law(s) or both. Campaign Reform Action Coalition "Equal Campaign Rights Amendment" Speeches Protest Demonstration Platforms Contact Your Senator Mother Writes "Hi Randy",I saw Larry King the other night with Phil Donahue. I have never been a proponent of P.D., but listened because he was promoting Nader. I have always been impressed by Ralph Nader for several reasons, not the least of which, he is not influenced by the special interest groups, nor the Powers That Be that drive the politicians. I'm listening to Nader as I did Ross Perot, whom I voted for the last 2 elections. Our government is completely paralyzed by politics and the media. Good for you for fighting for a good cause, our freedom! This is a Twenty Zeros special internet report. I'm Randy Frushour. This new Year/Decade/Century/Millennium is an unparalleled era with significant "beginninings and statehood" and in particulars with "U S political party moves" which cradles the activities of our present campaign reform motioning. A WORD FROM THE PUBLISHER 2-27-2001 The expanded word document will be published in the proceeding months as for "an implementing needed change" for an elections "backup support" and also as a safety net while set in place here for legislatings this date, hereafter as the "U S Multiparty Crusade" in concert with the "Independent Appeal". Legislation for campaign and elections reform at present is skimmpy and a likelyhood as elections 2004 begin to surface will too a dialog of serious questioning as today is presented and as in turn by "larger and more numerous interest groups." This editor suggests so as belief that such prior can lend and lead to "one solution" which is "U S Multiparty Campaign. Your annotated comments are welcomely requested and can upon request remain private as published or made public and known! On the page certain points "are just thoughts of my own" as I view our matter. Now todays report is in 5 catagories as follows. RESULTS of the election 2000 are "NOT by appearance" of newly elected individuals for U.S. White House office" with Statehood Status and (or as such accompaning agendas, for some time because a "much greater" picture negates here this critical threshold of importance attached to "one individaul" (with appointees) in one 4-year term, while of course we still could expect (and so) by support for our "nominee", the sight and partnered works beside the responsible new President. We then & therefore formalize their performance (as important to us) and also to other nations. Statehood should as follows take on it's signature of distinction with (a credible) record of itself or themself and not so by merely just a "or the" basis, of getting elected President or V.P. for 4 years. Do we hate anyone next door at our borders? Do we fear any one power abroad? Do we "manufacture or produce" American liberty for some who would buy it, here or abroad? The world at large is not unable to grip their own problems and ideals. OUTCOME(S) of election 2000 including our future elections, with or without a retroactive "New President" are the "mounted and impregnable armies" of legislative thinkers with a harbors load of court appeals, motions, appointees, strategies and legislating to further secure a biased interest supportive of 2 parties and (and that maybe) only a handful of these briefs involved in legislation beneficial to the overall population of the USA and while in neither part as a global referendum or a constituted "amendment of Equal Rights". We are the only global super power and whether or not that even matters in some future "frame of time and world" we might at least lay out to the onlooking communities our best "Model of Democracy." OPTIONS Aren't we the worlds greatest workers and professionals now entitled to options when electing a President? Not although as "for if some super-natural intelligence" above, beyond and before us itself biasedly involved on our campaign search across America in our behalf, for locating the 2 only qualified individuals and at such prompt we then get to exercise our freedom in voterights, gained upon us with the "popular and electoral" votings for "the New Winner"; so then expressed our vote power. WARNINGS The ultimate purpose as detailed and defined then for an electoral vote is an assisting (in the significance) of smaller states (such as in the election 2000; a state with as little and as less "the nearly 21 electoral votes" to decide in such a balance) the actual determining fair outcome of an election AND more importantly not to get reshuffled by bureaucrats of all or any national persuasions, in a "popular vote arena" where corporate power (not the likes of which have arisen in past histories of civilization been seen) can quickly and profitably skew votes. NO WE SHOULD NOT GIVE UP THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE. This is the prior importance of campaign & elections reform, whatever else the courts of our land might agree on. OTHERWISE the power elite or "corporate agressive(s)" in one quest or another can thereafter, in the name of "social conservativism" and/or "liberalism" (I've been called a liberal but I Am not a Democrat), then totalitarianize our community scale-programs with better or easier management in populated areas whereby organized, unfair, selfish and gainful practices would be the norm rather than the crime. This lack of liberty and justice would make "gang rule" look like a cartoon. NOTES: We likely will have sufficient time in the next few years of this Twenty Zeros first decade to transfer over in Elections Reform, to a "computerized voter database". Your comments are welcome on the issues of irregularities and absentee ballots fraud and will get arranged in order for our next and coming reports. The Frushour Twenty Zeros Report will be updated here regularly. Note 12.07.2000 The new President eventually will set the tone for the self-called Centrist Caucus forming today and will it ever be quite interesting to see them defined as a "Centrist" body in months ahead. The Republicans are stubborn on controlling as a majority and the Democrats are starting a bad habit of filing lawsuits over our democracy. The fight is on and Congress now sending Americans mixed signals of partisanship or national unity with a bi-partisan agenda even one month after the 2000 general elections. Non-partisanship should become the national or global norm with mild exceptions. Message To Viewers 12.12.2000We request you please climb aboard this tall project of a U.S. MultiParty (System) Crusade which I will update with annotated contents. As the work tasks of such a campaign have large involvements and is yet early in stage I will try to keep the outline in as much a generalization as possible until real milestones in our land occur and then can be opinionated. The MultiParty System is presently successful in 7 or 8 other large countries. I beleive pronnounced change in Society is now happening and not nearly the way the press brings it to us now and as but only electronic mediums such as Internet and/or Satellite based networks are capable of; swiftly leading these campaigns and projects to a fullfillment for our world and "my crusade is focused strictly" on bettering American voteright procedures that we currently are denied. Would you agree? All americans of age should be entitled to non-partisaned voterights and commissioned legal supports where and (immediately) when violations occur in elections season. I am dedicating my campaign efforts where and when I'm able, into U.S. Presidential elections and as for my personal campaign it places equal in priority to my normal publishing affair, that in seeking a fair "multiparty electorate system" and an international multiparty democratic economy or "multinational democratic republic" for US and our partners. TO THE GLOBAL FRONT - We have had the worlds fiercest military but have made too few gains with personal realities on the foreign front by foreign affair dignitaries, which is V I T A L to a "one competitive village" and its business(es) of better economic growth. If you think the world will just go away you should be reminded of the high fuel costs. This is only the beginning as even our best representatives still for the time respond to in interviews as with some sporting analogy for their interpretation of events unfolding. As even we await, in year 2000 the word which will be ultimately given by the Supreme Court rulings on selecting our first President of the Twenty Zeros, surely one of the events that will stay current in world news for probably at least these "first 4 years" of the first decade is "legal interpretations" of the U.S. "Election to Offices & the 2004 Debates" and their limits and legislatings, which is where we come in. We as a V O I C E Now have no hinderance to getting across our platforms and speakers to positions for office and our public leaderships formated on this mission, as time & perspective is on our side though as have of late been on politicians side. "Our Constitution," which some (of us) feel is antiquated is that next which lawyers are now and then going to tear into "only more and" of an expense, only "doing and making more party damage" with "certain global portrayal of a travesty of civil rights" in the U S and a 2 in 1 party syndrome to nations abroad who are already commenting as predicted. This site is commited to maintaining civil peace in our land and remains always non-partisan to this whole issue other than its goal of an attempt to usher in a multiparty system with literal terms for the methods of the federal & State Electoral College selection process and their powerful laws. This event we feel should help and not hinder common causes and the "American Dream", if we evolve "a multiparty system." Public Office is a Profession of public service and yes is for professionals only, yet our most sacred office has been less than an ethical place for political working of "checks and balances," so will surely find "some of us" in days, months and years ahead in better official positions than are our present politicians and more in numbers than the political groups (that are) postured today, (yet we) who are not even politicians. In weeks ahead you are going to see digressed, minimal legislative accomplishment in our land of America without peopled reform, so I ask you then to come out and cross party lines for personal and individual review of and to this editors "multiparty crusade" for a proposed law "but zeroed as general in terms on such," for an "Equal Campaign Rights Amendment." The announcement of this proposal is not nearly even close to being solely my project at and during this time while I initially thought so in December 2000. Of late such notion of it has swept passed barriors all across the United States and I expect that a constituancy for victorious cermony some near day are already in place online and will be seen around the world wide. Have you ever thought of someone you might want to be President or Vice- President? It may have been or now "may be someone" who is a leader in another aspect of our community and/or our popular culture. Maybe someone who is not even a politician but who is someone that discretionarily thinks, talks and acts clearly and backs up what She or He sees to do and promises! Yes even maybe someone of a gender or race other than the usual. Ralph Nader is of Lebanese decent I am told. What so does that matter? Mr. Nader has upheld American life unparalled for nearly 4 decades and in his own unique way saw then in his latter career years, how to better America with a one or 2 time run at the White House. NOTHING WRONG here is there? I myself am of the gender and race of every President we've ever and always had. I'd stake my life on ( foolishly yes, maybe) this that, the "observable caucasion phenomenon" will never ever pass (assuming if that is what you like or wish) as long as there are merely 2 parties. California Senator Writes "FRIEND"I appreciate your advising me of your concern, providing me a fuller sense of what's at stake as I proceed to my judgment regarding your matter. |
 Sign Guestbook |
 View Guestbook |
 publisher@unitedstates.com |
|
. |
| Visitors: 01198 |